AADR is an ETF, whereas AFGZX is a mutual fund. AADR has a lower 5-year return than AFGZX (3.27% vs 6.38%). AADR has a higher expense ratio than AFGZX (1.1% vs 0.99%). Below is the comparison between AADR and AFGZX.
|Security Type||ETF||Mutual fund|
|Segment||Equity: Global Ex-U.S. - Total Market Growth||N/A|
|Management Style||passive (index-based)||passive|
The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation above international benchmarks such as the MSCI EAFE Index and the BNY Mellon Classic ADR Index. The Fund selects a portfolio of U.S. traded securities of non-U.S. organizations, most often American Depositary Receipts (ADRs), included in the BNY Mellon Classic ADR Index.
AADR performance & returns
Top 10 Holdings (45.63% of Total Assets)
|NICE Ltd ADR||NICE||6.54%|
|Gold Fields Ltd ADR||GFI.JO||5.86%|
|argenx SE ADR||ARGX||5.52%|
|Anglogold Ashanti Ltd ADR||AU.JO||3.64%|
|TAL Education Group ADR||TAL||3.63%|
|ASML Holding NV ADR||ASML||3.59%|
|ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc ADR||ZTO||3.35%|
|Sibanye Stillwater Ltd ADR||SBSW.JO||3.21%|
|LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE ADR||LVMUY.PA||3.08%|
AADR prosNone that we could think of.
AADR consNone that we could think of.
Other relevant AADR comparisons
You may also want to check out the following AADR comparisons that investors often look for on Finny
The Fund seeks capital appreciation by investing primarily in equity securities, or securities convertible into equity securities, that trade on the U.S. and Chinese securities markets and are economically tied to China or the United States.
AFGZX performance & returns
Top 10 Holdings (36.97% of Total Assets)
|Applied Materials Inc||AMAT||3.14%|
|Tencent Holdings Ltd||00700||3.13%|
|Eurofins Scientific SE||ERF.PA||3.13%|
|Lululemon Athletica Inc||LULU||2.90%|
|Sika AG Registered Shares||SIKA||2.81%|
AFGZX prosNone that we could think of.
AFGZX consNone that we could think of.
Other relevant AFGZX comparisons
You may also want to check out the following AFGZX comparisons that investors often look for on Finny