AADR is an ETF, whereas AOPAX is a mutual fund. AADR has a higher 5-year return than AOPAX (5.85% vs -0.24%). Below is the comparison between AADR and AOPAX.
AADR | AOPAX | |
---|---|---|
Security Type | ETF | Mutual fund |
Segment | Equity: Global Ex-U.S. - Total Market Growth | International Equity: Foreign Small/Mid Growth |
Family | AdvisorShares | Virtus |
Net Assets | $48.90M | N/A |
Expense Ratio | N/A | N/A |
Management Style | passive (index-based) | active |
Dividend Yield | 0.31% | N/A |
Minimum Investment | N/A | $1,000.00 |
YTD Return | -19.49% | -28.60% |
1-Year Return | -19.94% | -16.44% |
3-Year Return | 4.94% | -0.33% |
5-Year Return | 5.85% | -0.24% |
10-Year Return | 6.56% | 5.56% |
AADR
AADR description
The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation above international benchmarks such as the MSCI EAFE Index and the BNY Mellon Classic ADR Index. The Fund selects a portfolio of U.S. traded securities of non-U.S. organizations, most often American Depositary Receipts (ADRs), included in the BNY Mellon Classic ADR Index.
AADR performance & returns
YTD Return | -19.49% |
1-Month Return | -10.60% |
3-Month Return | -16.82% |
1-Year Return | -19.94% |
3-Year Return | 4.94% |
5-Year Return | 5.85% |
10-Year Return | 6.56% |
AADR holdings
Top 10 Holdings (45.63% of Total Assets)
Name | Symbol | % Assets |
---|---|---|
MercadoLibre Inc | MELI.SA | 7.21% |
NICE Ltd ADR | NICE | 6.54% |
Gold Fields Ltd ADR | GFI.JO | 5.86% |
argenx SE ADR | ARGX | 5.52% |
Anglogold Ashanti Ltd ADR | AU.JO | 3.64% |
TAL Education Group ADR | TAL | 3.63% |
ASML Holding NV ADR | ASML | 3.59% |
ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc ADR | ZTO | 3.35% |
Sibanye Stillwater Ltd ADR | SBSW.JO | 3.21% |
LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE ADR | LVMUY.PA | 3.08% |
AADR pros
None that we could think of.AADR cons
None that we could think of.Other relevant AADR comparisons
You may also want to check out the following AADR comparisons that investors often look for on Finny
AOPAX
AOPAX description
AOPAX performance & returns
YTD Return | -28.60% |
1-Month Return | -7.62% |
3-Month Return | -16.44% |
1-Year Return | -16.44% |
3-Year Return | -0.33% |
5-Year Return | -0.24% |
10-Year Return | 5.56% |
AOPAX holdings
Top 10 Holdings (19.77% of Total Assets)
Name | Symbol | % Assets |
---|---|---|
ITOCHU Techno-Solutions Corp | 4739 | 2.67% |
Marui Group Co Ltd | 8252 | 2.38% |
Azbil Corp | 6845 | 2.31% |
Penta-Ocean Construction Co Ltd | 1893 | 1.99% |
Jeol Ltd | 6951 | 1.83% |
Nihon Unisys Ltd | 8056 | 1.82% |
Mitsubishi UFJ Lease & Finance Co Ltd | 8593 | 1.73% |
Tosoh Corp | 4042 | 1.71% |
Interroll Holding Ltd | INRN | 1.67% |
Fuji Electric Co Ltd | 6504 | 1.66% |
AOPAX pros
None that we could think of.AOPAX cons
The following are AOPAX weaknesses from our perspective:
- AOPAX net assets are $0.00 million. This fund is not a popular choice with retail investors.
- AOPAX 3-year return is -0.33%, which is lower than the 3-year return of the benchmark index (MSCI World Ex USA Small Cap NR USD), 3%.
- AOPAX 5-year return is -0.24%, which is lower than the 5-year return of the benchmark index (MSCI World Ex USA Small Cap NR USD), 2.23%.
- AOPAX 10-year return is 5.56%, which is lower than the 10-year return of the benchmark index (MSCI World Ex USA Small Cap NR USD), 6.98%.
- Warning: this fund has a front-end sales fee. The maximum front-end fee is 5.5%. Front-end sales load, also known as sales charge, is a fee paid when mutual funds shares are purchased. Those fees are subtracted from your total investable assets.
Other relevant AOPAX comparisons
You may also want to check out the following AOPAX comparisons that investors often look for on Finny
- AOPAX vs ACINX
- AOPAX vs GPIOX
- AOPAX vs AIOIX
- AOPAX vs ALOIX
- AOPAX vs AOPCX
- AOPAX vs ARTJX
- AOPAX vs BCSFX
- AOPAX vs BCSVX
- AOPAX vs DRIOX
- AOPAX vs EPIEX