AADR is an ETF, whereas BRKUX is a mutual fund. AADR has a higher 5-year return than BRKUX (5.23% vs 4.76%). Below is the comparison between AADR and BRKUX.
| AADR | BRKUX | |
|---|---|---|
| Security Type | ETF | Mutual fund |
| Segment | Equity: Global Ex-U.S. - Total Market Growth | N/A |
| Family | AdvisorShares | MFS |
| Net Assets | $43.70M | N/A |
| Expense Ratio | 1.10% | N/A |
| Management Style | passive (index-based) | passive |
| Dividend Yield | 0.31% | N/A |
| Minimum Investment | N/A | N/A |
| YTD Return | -17.18% | -17.12% |
| 1-Year Return | -22.50% | -19.30% |
| 3-Year Return | 2.08% | 0.39% |
| 5-Year Return | 5.23% | 4.76% |
| 10-Year Return | 6.83% | 0.00% |
AADR
AADR description
The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation above international benchmarks such as the MSCI EAFE Index and the BNY Mellon Classic ADR Index. The Fund selects a portfolio of U.S. traded securities of non-U.S. organizations, most often American Depositary Receipts (ADRs), included in the BNY Mellon Classic ADR Index.
AADR performance & returns
| YTD Return | -17.18% |
| 1-Month Return | 9.02% |
| 3-Month Return | 2.72% |
| 1-Year Return | -22.50% |
| 3-Year Return | 2.08% |
| 5-Year Return | 5.23% |
| 10-Year Return | 6.83% |
AADR holdings
Top 10 Holdings (38.80% of Total Assets)
| Name | Symbol | % Assets |
|---|---|---|
| ASML Holding NV ADR | ASML | 5.52% |
| BioNTech SE ADR | BNTX.DE | 4.57% |
| Danaos Corp | DAC.AX | 4.48% |
| LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE ADR | LVMUY.PA | 4.16% |
| Himax Technologies Inc ADR | HIMX | 3.79% |
| Sibanye Stillwater Ltd ADR | SBSW.JO | 3.64% |
| Logitech International SA | LOGN | 3.51% |
| Cemex SAB de CV ADR | CX.MX | 3.22% |
| Embraer SA ADR | ERJ.SA | 3.06% |
| POSCO ADR | PKX.KS | 2.85% |
AADR pros
None that we could think of.AADR cons
None that we could think of.Other relevant AADR comparisons
You may also want to check out the following AADR comparisons that investors often look for on Finny
BRKUX
BRKUX description
BRKUX performance & returns
| YTD Return | -17.12% |
| 1-Month Return | -1.21% |
| 3-Month Return | -5.70% |
| 1-Year Return | -19.30% |
| 3-Year Return | 0.39% |
| 5-Year Return | 4.76% |
| 10-Year Return | 0.00% |
BRKUX holdings
Top 10 Holdings (28.02% of Total Assets)
| Name | Symbol | % Assets |
|---|---|---|
| Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd | 2330.TW | 7.70% |
| Samsung Electronics Co Ltd | 005930.KS | 4.79% |
| Tencent Holdings Ltd | 00700 | 4.08% |
| Tata Consultancy Services Ltd | TCS.BO | 1.92% |
| Alibaba Group Holding Ltd ADR | BABA | 1.84% |
| NetEase Inc ADR | NTES | 1.62% |
| Hon Hai Precision Industry Co Ltd | 2317.TW | 1.57% |
| China Construction Bank Corp Class H | 00939 | 1.56% |
| Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd Class H | 02318 | 1.48% |
| Chailease Holding Co Ltd | 5871.TW | 1.46% |
BRKUX pros
The following are BRKUX strengths from our perspective:
- Good news: this fund does not have 12b1, front-end or back-end sales fees.
BRKUX cons
The following are BRKUX weaknesses from our perspective:
- BRKUX net assets are $0.10 million. This fund is not a popular choice with retail investors.
- BRKUX 3-year return is 0.2%, which is lower than the 3-year return of the benchmark index (MSCI EM NR USD), 2.54%.
- BRKUX expense ratio is 0.99%, which is not negligible. Is the fund expensive to you, and does it align to your investment strategy?
Other relevant BRKUX comparisons
You may also want to check out the following BRKUX comparisons that investors often look for on Finny