Both AADR and BWZ are ETFs. AADR has a higher 5-year return than BWZ (3.9% vs -2.01%). AADR has a higher expense ratio than BWZ (1.1% vs 0.35%). Below is the comparison between AADR and BWZ.
| AADR | BWZ | |
|---|---|---|
| Security Type | ETF | ETF |
| Segment | Equity: Global Ex-U.S. - Total Market Growth | Fixed Income: Global Ex-U.S. - Sovereign Investment Grade Short-Term |
| Family | AdvisorShares | State Street Global Advisors |
| Net Assets | $43.70M | $150.50M |
| Expense Ratio | 1.10% | 0.35% |
| Management Style | passive (index-based) | passive (index-based) |
| Dividend Yield | 0.31% | 1.55% |
| Underlying Index | -- | Bloomberg Barclays 1-3 Year Global Treasury ex-U.S. Capped Index |
| YTD Return | -23.35% | -12.21% |
| 1-Year Return | -24.53% | -14.97% |
| 3-Year Return | -1.29% | -4.41% |
| 5-Year Return | 3.90% | -2.01% |
| 10-Year Return | 6.44% | -2.47% |
AADR
AADR description
The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation above international benchmarks such as the MSCI EAFE Index and the BNY Mellon Classic ADR Index. The Fund selects a portfolio of U.S. traded securities of non-U.S. organizations, most often American Depositary Receipts (ADRs), included in the BNY Mellon Classic ADR Index.
AADR performance & returns
| YTD Return | -23.35% |
| 1-Month Return | -0.50% |
| 3-Month Return | -12.96% |
| 1-Year Return | -24.53% |
| 3-Year Return | -1.29% |
| 5-Year Return | 3.90% |
| 10-Year Return | 6.44% |
AADR holdings
Top 10 Holdings (38.80% of Total Assets)
| Name | Symbol | % Assets |
|---|---|---|
| ASML Holding NV ADR | ASML | 5.52% |
| BioNTech SE ADR | BNTX.DE | 4.57% |
| Danaos Corp | DAC.AX | 4.48% |
| LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE ADR | LVMUY.PA | 4.16% |
| Himax Technologies Inc ADR | HIMX | 3.79% |
| Sibanye Stillwater Ltd ADR | SBSW.JO | 3.64% |
| Logitech International SA | LOGN | 3.51% |
| Cemex SAB de CV ADR | CX.MX | 3.22% |
| Embraer SA ADR | ERJ.SA | 3.06% |
| POSCO ADR | PKX.KS | 2.85% |
AADR pros
None that we could think of.AADR cons
None that we could think of.Other relevant AADR comparisons
You may also want to check out the following AADR comparisons that investors often look for on Finny
BWZ
BWZ description
The Fund seeks to provide investment results that, before fees and expenses, correspond generally to the price and yield performance of the Bloomberg 1-3 Year Global Treasury ex-US Capped Index. The Fund employs a sampling strategy, which means that the Fund is not required to purchase all of the securities of the Index.
BWZ performance & returns
| YTD Return | -12.21% |
| 1-Month Return | -1.28% |
| 3-Month Return | -5.20% |
| 1-Year Return | -14.97% |
| 3-Year Return | -4.41% |
| 5-Year Return | -2.01% |
| 10-Year Return | -2.47% |
BWZ holdings
Top 10 Holdings (14.78% of Total Assets)
| Name | Symbol | % Assets |
|---|---|---|
| China (People's Republic Of) 2.36% | N/A | 4.44% |
| The Republic of Korea 1.25% | N/A | 4.36% |
| Japan (Government Of) 0.6% | N/A | 2.02% |
| Japan (Government Of) 0.1% | N/A | 2.00% |
| Japan(Govt Of) 0.1% | N/A | 1.96% |
BWZ pros
None that we could think of.BWZ cons
The following are BWZ weaknesses from our perspective:
- BWZ net assets are $150.50 million. This fund is not a popular choice with retail investors.
- BWZ 3-year return is -4.41%, which is lower than the 3-year return of the benchmark index (Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond TR USD), -1.07%.
- BWZ 5-year return is -2.01%, which is lower than the 5-year return of the benchmark index (Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond TR USD), 0.54%.
- BWZ 10-year return is -2.47%, which is lower than the 10-year return of the benchmark index (Bloomberg US Aggregate Bond TR USD), 1.41%.
Other relevant BWZ comparisons
You may also want to check out the following BWZ comparisons that investors often look for on Finny