Get comparisons, analyses and forecasts for stocks, ETFs & funds
AADR vs CHIR
AADR is an ETF, whereas CHIR is a mutual fund. AADR has a higher expense ratio than CHIR (1.1% vs 0.66%). Below is the comparison between AADR and CHIR.
| AADR | CHIR | |
|---|---|---|
| Security Type | ETF | ETF |
| Segment | Equity: Global Ex-U.S. - Total Market Growth | N/A |
| Family | AdvisorShares | Global X Funds |
| Net Assets | $86.40M | $5.30M |
| Expense Ratio | 1.10% | 0.66% |
| Management Style | passive (index-based) | passive |
| Dividend Yield | 0.10% | 4.45% |
| Minimum Investment | N/A | N/A |
| YTD Return | 6.34% | 4.31% |
| 1-Year Return | 40.51% | 5.17% |
| 3-Year Return | 3.85% | N/A |
| 5-Year Return | 11.90% | N/A |
| 10-Year Return | 8.30% | N/A |
AADR description
AADR performance & returns
| YTD Return | 6.34% |
| 1-Month Return | 2.19% |
| 3-Month Return | -3.36% |
| 1-Year Return | 40.51% |
| 3-Year Return | 3.85% |
| 5-Year Return | 11.90% |
| 10-Year Return | 8.30% |
AADR expense ratio is 1.1%.
AADR holdings
Top 10 Holdings (45.63% of Total Assets)
| Name | Symbol | % Assets |
|---|---|---|
| MercadoLibre Inc | MELI.SA | 7.21% |
| NICE Ltd ADR | NICE | 6.54% |
| Gold Fields Ltd ADR | GFI.JO | 5.86% |
| argenx SE ADR | ARGX | 5.52% |
| Anglogold Ashanti Ltd ADR | AU.JO | 3.64% |
| TAL Education Group ADR | TAL | 3.63% |
| ASML Holding NV ADR | ASML | 3.59% |
| ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc ADR | ZTO | 3.35% |
| Sibanye Stillwater Ltd ADR | SBSW.JO | 3.21% |
| LVMH Moet Hennessy Louis Vuitton SE ADR | LVMUY.PA | 3.08% |
Other relevant AADR comparisons
You may also want to check out the following AADR comparisons that investors often look for on Finny
Or use Finny Compare Wizard to create a comparison you’d like to see.
CHIR description
The Fund seeks to provide investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance of the MSCI China Real Estate 10/50 Index. The Index is designed to measure the performance of securities that are classified as operating in China according to the MSCI Global Investable Markets Index Methodology.
CHIR performance & returns
| YTD Return | 4.31% |
| 1-Month Return | -3.60% |
| 3-Month Return | 5.17% |
| 1-Year Return | 5.17% |
| 3-Year Return | N/A |
| 5-Year Return | N/A |
| 10-Year Return | N/A |
CHIR expense ratio is 0.66%.
CHIR holdings
Top 10 Holdings (63.03% of Total Assets)
| Name | Symbol | % Assets |
|---|---|---|
| Longfor Group Holdings Ltd | 00960 | 9.47% |
| China Resources Land Ltd | 01109 | 8.95% |
| Country Garden Holdings Co Ltd | 02007 | 8.73% |
| China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd | 00688 | 8.00% |
| Sunac China Holdings Ltd | 01918 | 7.91% |
| KE Holdings Inc ADR | BEKE | 5.32% |
| China Vanke Co Ltd Class H | 02202 | 3.86% |
| Shimao Group Holdings Ltd | 00813 | 3.77% |
| China Evergrande Group | 03333 | 3.68% |
| The Wharf (Holdings) Ltd | 00004.HK | 3.34% |
Other relevant CHIR comparisons
You may also want to check out the following CHIR comparisons that investors often look for on Finny
Or use Finny Compare Wizard to create a comparison you’d like to see.
You can check out all comparisons Finny users have looked for here. Feel free to the browse the list and view the comparisons that are of an interest to you.
