Ask a Finny Coach
Sign in
Get comparisons, analyses and forecasts for stocks, ETFs & funds
AADR vs CHIR
AADR is an ETF, whereas CHIR is a mutual fund. AADR has a higher expense ratio than CHIR (1.1% vs 0.65%). Below is the comparison between AADR and CHIR.
| AADR | CHIR | |
|---|---|---|
| Security Type | ETF | Mutual fund |
| Segment | Equity: Global Ex-U.S. - Total Market Growth | N/A |
| Issuer | AdvisorShares | Global X Funds |
| Net Assets | $69.25M | $2M |
| Expense Ratio | 1.10% | 0.65% |
| Management Style | passive (index-based) | passive |
| Dividend Yield | 0.68% | 3.48% |
| Minimum Investment | N/A | N/A |
| YTD Return | -13.66% | -16.90% |
| 1-Year Return | 3.18% | -2.43% |
| 3-Year Return | -1.15% | N/A |
| 5-Year Return | 3.36% | N/A |
| 10-Year Return | N/A | N/A |
AADR description
The Fund seeks long-term capital appreciation above international benchmarks such as the MSCI EAFE Index and the BNY Mellon Classic ADR Index. The Fund selects a portfolio of U.S. traded securities of non-U.S. organizations, most often American Depositary Receipts (ADRs), included in the BNY Mellon Classic ADR Index.
AADR performance & returns
| YTD Return | -13.66% |
| 1-Month Return | 6.91% |
| 3-Month Return | -17.61% |
| 1-Year Return | 3.18% |
| 3-Year Return | -1.15% |
| 5-Year Return | 3.36% |
| 10-Year Return | N/A |
AADR expense ratio is 1.1%.
AADR holdings
Top 10 Holdings (41.23% of Total Assets)
| Name | Symbol | % Assets |
|---|---|---|
| Galapagos NV ADR | GLPG | 6.19% |
| NICE Ltd ADR | NICE | 5.42% |
| argenx SE ADR | ARGX | 4.32% |
| ZTO Express (Cayman) Inc ADR | ZTO | 4.04% |
| TAL Education Group ADR | TAL | 3.83% |
| MercadoLibre Inc | MELI.SA | 3.82% |
| Anglogold Ashanti Ltd ADR | AU.JO | 3.45% |
| ASML Holding NV ADR | ASML | 3.42% |
| AstraZeneca PLC ADR | AZN.L | 3.38% |
| Gold Fields Ltd ADR | GFI.JO | 3.36% |
Other relevant AADR comparisons
You may also want to check out the following AADR comparisons that investors often look for on Finny
- AADR vs TRLHX
- AADR vs MMFGX
- AADR vs RRTIX
- AADR vs PGETX
- AADR vs JLADX
- AADR vs TWARX
- AADR vs MMFFX
- AADR vs BIPGX
- AADR vs PGGXX
- AADR vs HTNIX
Or use Finny Compare Wizard to create a comparison you’d like to see.
CHIR description
The Fund seeks to provide investment results that correspond generally to the price and yield performance of the MSCI China Real Estate 10/50 Index. The Index is designed to measure the performance of securities that are classified as operating in China according to the MSCI Global Investable Markets Index Methodology.
CHIR performance & returns
| YTD Return | -16.90% |
| 1-Month Return | 0.35% |
| 3-Month Return | -10.29% |
| 1-Year Return | -2.43% |
| 3-Year Return | N/A |
| 5-Year Return | N/A |
| 10-Year Return | N/A |
CHIR expense ratio is 0.65%.
CHIR holdings
Top 10 Holdings (63.26% of Total Assets)
| Name | Symbol | % Assets |
|---|---|---|
| China Resources Land Ltd | 01109 | 9.33% |
| Longfor Group Holdings Ltd | 00960 | 9.3% |
| Country Garden Holdings Co Ltd | 02007 | 9% |
| China Overseas Land & Investment Ltd | 00688 | 8.84% |
| Sunac China Holdings Ltd | 01918 | 8.57% |
| Shimao Property Holdings Ltd | 00813 | 4.63% |
| China Jinmao Holdings Group Ltd | 00817.HK | 3.95% |
| China Vanke Co Ltd Class H | 02202 | 3.87% |
| China Evergrande Group | 03333 | 3.1% |
| Logan Property Holdings Co Ltd | 03380 | 2.67% |
Other relevant CHIR comparisons
You may also want to check out the following CHIR comparisons that investors often look for on Finny
Or use Finny Compare Wizard to create a comparison you’d like to see.
You can check out all comparisons Finny users have looked for here. Feel free to the browse the list and view the comparisons that are of an interest to you.
