Both KBA and KFYP are ETFs. KBA has a higher 5-year return than KFYP (0.11% vs -1.03%). KBA has a lower expense ratio than KFYP (0.56% vs 0.68%). Below is the comparison between KBA and KFYP.
| KBA | KFYP | |
|---|---|---|
| Security Type | ETF | ETF |
| Finny Score | 0 | 25 |
| Category | China Region | China Region |
| Family | KraneShares | KraneShares |
| Net Assets | N/A | N/A |
| Expense Ratio | 0.56% | 0.68% |
| Management Style | passive (index-based) | passive (index-based) |
| Dividend Yield | 1.74% | 3.37% |
| Underlying Index | MSCI China A International Index | Zacks New China Index |
| YTD Return | -7.45% | 1.06% |
| 1-Year Return | -11.85% | -6.77% |
| 3-Year Return | 1.67% | 4.33% |
| 5-Year Return | 0.11% | -1.03% |
| 10-Year Return | 0.00% | 0.00% |
KBA
KBA description
KraneShares Trust - KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETF is an exchange traded fund launched and managed by Krane Funds Advisors, LLC. It is co-managed by Bosera Asset Management (International) Co Ltd. It invests in public equity markets of China. It invests in stocks of companies operating across diversified sectors. The fund invests in growth and value stocks of companies across diversified market capitalization. The fund seeks to track the performance of the MSCI China A 50 Connect Index (USD), by using representative sampling technique. KraneShares Trust - KraneShares Bosera MSCI China A 50 Connect Index ETF was formed on March 4, 2014 and is domiciled in the United States.
KBA performance & returns
| YTD Return | -7.45% |
| 1-Month Return | -4.88% |
| 3-Month Return | -8.85% |
| 1-Year Return | -11.85% |
| 3-Year Return | 1.67% |
| 5-Year Return | 0.11% |
| 10-Year Return | 0.00% |
KBA holdings
Top 10 Holdings (46.51% of Total Assets)
| Name | Symbol | % Assets |
|---|---|---|
| Kweichow Moutai Co Ltd Class A | 600519 | 7.80% |
| Wanhua Chemical Group Co Ltd Class A | 600309 | 6.99% |
| Contemporary Amperex Technology Co Ltd Class A | 300750 | 6.99% |
| Zijin Mining Group Co Ltd Class A | 601899 | 4.79% |
| LONGi Green Energy Technology Co Ltd Class A | 601012 | 4.22% |
| BYD Co Ltd Class A | 002594 | 3.54% |
| China Merchants Bank Co Ltd Class A | 600036 | 3.42% |
| Luxshare Precision Industry Co Ltd Class A | 002475 | 3.05% |
| Tongwei Co Ltd Class A | 600438 | 2.95% |
| Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd Class A | 601318 | 2.77% |
KBA pros
None that we could think of.KBA cons
The following are KBA weaknesses from our perspective:
- KBA net assets are $0.00 million. This fund is not a popular choice with retail investors.
- KBA 3-year return is 1.46%, which is lower than the 3-year return of the benchmark index (MSCI ACWI Ex USA NR USD), 2.21%.
- KBA 5-year return is 0.48%, which is lower than the 5-year return of the benchmark index (MSCI ACWI Ex USA NR USD), 2.33%.
- KBA expense ratio is 0.56%, which is not negligible. Is the fund expensive to you, and does it align to your investment strategy?
Other relevant KBA comparisons
You may also want to check out the following KBA comparisons that investors often look for on Finny
- KBA vs SOP
- KBA vs ASHR
- KBA vs CNYA
- KBA vs HAHA
- KBA vs CN
- KBA vs ASHX
- KBA vs CNHX
- KBA vs FCA
- KBA vs GXC
- KBA vs KFYP
- KBA vs MCHI
KFYP
KFYP description
KraneShares Trust - KraneShares CICC China Leaders 100 Index ETF is an exchange traded fund launched and managed by Krane Funds Advisors, LLC. The fund invests in public equity markets of China. The fund invests in stocks of companies operating across diversified sectors. It invests in growth and value stocks of companies across diversified market capitalization. It invests in dividend paying stocks of companies. The fund seeks to track the performance of the CSI CICC Select 100 Index, by using representative sampling technique. KraneShares Trust - KraneShares CICC China Leaders 100 Index ETF was formed on July 22, 2013 and is domiciled in the United States.
KFYP performance & returns
| YTD Return | 1.06% |
| 1-Month Return | -6.34% |
| 3-Month Return | -1.26% |
| 1-Year Return | -6.77% |
| 3-Year Return | 4.33% |
| 5-Year Return | -1.03% |
| 10-Year Return | 0.00% |
KFYP holdings
Top 10 Holdings (43.78% of Total Assets)
| Name | Symbol | % Assets |
|---|---|---|
| Midea Group Co Ltd Class A | 000333 | 5.66% |
| Gree Electric Appliances Inc of Zhuhai Class A | 000651 | 5.15% |
| China Merchants Bank Co Ltd Class A | 600036 | 5.04% |
| Industrial And Commercial Bank Of China Ltd Class A | 601398 | 4.84% |
| Industrial Bank Co Ltd Class A | 601166 | 4.81% |
| Bank of Communications Co Ltd Class A | 601328 | 4.45% |
| China State Construction Engineering Corp Ltd Class A | 601668 | 4.02% |
| Ping An Bank Co Ltd Class A | 000001 | 3.52% |
| Agricultural Bank of China Ltd Class A | 601288 | 3.18% |
| Tongwei Co Ltd Class A | 600438 | 3.12% |
KFYP pros
The following are KFYP strengths from our perspective:
- KFYP 3-year return is 4.36%, which is higher than the 3-year return of the benchmark index (MSCI ACWI Ex USA NR USD), 2.21%.
KFYP cons
The following are KFYP weaknesses from our perspective:
- KFYP net assets are $0.00 million. This fund is not a popular choice with retail investors.
- KFYP 5-year return is 0.08%, which is lower than the 5-year return of the benchmark index (MSCI ACWI Ex USA NR USD), 2.33%.
- KFYP expense ratio is 0.68%, which is not negligible. Is the fund expensive to you, and does it align to your investment strategy?
Other relevant KFYP comparisons
You may also want to check out the following KFYP comparisons that investors often look for on Finny
- KFYP vs ASHR
- KFYP vs CNYA
- KFYP vs HAHA
- KFYP vs CN
- KFYP vs ASHX
- KFYP vs CNHX
- KFYP vs FCA
- KFYP vs GXC
- KFYP vs KBA
- KFYP vs MCHI