KWEB vs EMQQ

Both EMQQ and KWEB are ETFs. EMQQ has a higher 5-year return than KWEB (-2.11% vs -9.84%). EMQQ has a higher expense ratio than KWEB (0.86% vs 0.69%). Below is the comparison between EMQQ and KWEB.

Together with FinMasters
Stock Wars
Pick any two stocks and find out how much money each would've made you had you purchased them at the same time.
EMQQ KWEB
Security Type ETF ETF
Finny Score 0 0
Category Diversified Emerging Mkts China Region
Family Exchange Traded Concepts KraneShares
Net Assets N/A N/A
Expense Ratio 0.86% 0.69%
Management Style passive (index-based) passive (index-based)
Dividend Yield 0.00% 0.00%
Underlying Index EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce Index CSI Overseas China Internet Index
YTD Return -2.89% -12.15%
1-Year Return 2.89% 3.39%
3-Year Return -17.54% -25.04%
5-Year Return -2.11% -9.84%
10-Year Return 0.00% 0.22%

EMQQ

EMQQ description

Exchange Traded Concepts Trust - EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce ETF is an exchange traded fund launched and managed by Exchange Traded Concepts, LLC. The fund is co-managed by Penserra Capital Management, LLC. The fund invests in public equity markets of global emerging region. It invests in stocks of companies operating across consumer discretionary, consumer services, hotels, restaurants and leisure, casinos and gaming, gaming operations, online gaming operations, hotels, resorts and cruise lines, travel and tourism services, travel agencies, online travel agencies, online hotel booking services, online transportation booking services, media and entertainment, entertainment, media, advertising, broadcast advertising, internet advertising, broadcasting, web broadcasts and cybercasts, movies and entertainment, entertainment venues, online entertainment, retailing, internet and direct marketing retail, internet and direct marketing retail, information technology, software and services, internet software, website security software, web site management software, it services, internet services and infrastructure, software, application software, office and home productivity software, e-mail software, enterprise software, customer relationship management (crm) software, e-mail management software, systems software, security software, communication services sectors. It invests in growth and value stocks of companies across diversified market capitalization. It seeks to track the performance of the EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce Index, by using full replication technique. Exchange Traded Concepts Trust - EMQQ The Emerging Markets Internet & Ecommerce ETF was formed on November 12, 2014 and is domiciled in the United States.

EMQQ performance & returns

YTD Return -2.89%
1-Month Return -2.35%
3-Month Return -3.61%
1-Year Return 2.89%
3-Year Return -17.54%
5-Year Return -2.11%
10-Year Return 0.00%
EMQQ expense ratio is 0.86%.

EMQQ holdings

Top 10 Holdings (62.20% of Total Assets)

Name Symbol % Assets
PDD Holdings Inc ADR PDD 10.77%
Alibaba Group Holding Ltd Ordinary Shares 09988 8.22%
Tencent Holdings Ltd 00700 7.43%
Meituan Class B 03690 7.07%
Reliance Industries Ltd RELIANCE 6.92%
MercadoLibre Inc MELI 6.19%
Baidu Inc 09888 4.07%
JD.com Inc Ordinary Shares - Class A 09618 3.90%
NetEase Inc Ordinary Shares 09999 3.88%
Naspers Ltd Class N NPN 3.76%

EMQQ pros

None that we could think of.

EMQQ cons

None that we could think of.

Other relevant EMQQ comparisons

You may also want to check out the following EMQQ comparisons that investors often look for on Finny

    Or use Finny's Comparison Tool to create a comparison you'd like to see.

    KWEB

    KWEB description

    KraneShares Trust - KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF is an exchange traded fund launched and managed by Krane Funds Advisors, LLC. The fund invests in public equity markets of China. The fund invests in stocks of companies operating across information technology, software and services, IT services, internet services and infrastructure, software, application software, internet software sectors. It invests in growth and value stocks of companies across diversified market capitalization. It seeks to track the performance of the CSI Overseas China Internet Index, by using representative sampling technique. KraneShares Trust - KraneShares CSI China Internet ETF was formed on July 31, 2013 and is domiciled in the United States.

    KWEB performance & returns

    YTD Return -12.15%
    1-Month Return -1.59%
    3-Month Return -3.74%
    1-Year Return 3.39%
    3-Year Return -25.04%
    5-Year Return -9.84%
    10-Year Return 0.22%
    KWEB expense ratio is 0.69%.

    KWEB holdings

    Top 10 Holdings (62.15% of Total Assets)

    Name Symbol % Assets
    Alibaba Group Holding Ltd Ordinary Shares 09988 9.25%
    PDD Holdings Inc ADR PDD 9.25%
    Tencent Holdings Ltd 00700 8.97%
    Meituan Class B 03690 7.85%
    Baidu Inc 09888 6.09%
    NetEase Inc Ordinary Shares 09999 4.52%
    Kuaishou Technology Ordinary Shares - Class B 01024 4.22%
    Trip.com Group Ltd 09961 4.13%
    KE Holdings Inc ADR BEKE 4.05%
    Full Truck Alliance Co Ltd ADR YMM 3.82%

    KWEB pros

    None that we could think of.

    KWEB cons

    The following are KWEB weaknesses from our perspective:

    • KWEB net assets are $0.00 million. This fund is not a popular choice with retail investors.
    • KWEB 3-year return is -25.04%, which is lower than the 3-year return of the benchmark index (MSCI ACWI Ex USA NR USD), 2.21%.
    • KWEB 5-year return is -9.84%, which is lower than the 5-year return of the benchmark index (MSCI ACWI Ex USA NR USD), 2.33%.
    • KWEB 10-year return is 0.22%, which is lower than the 10-year return of the benchmark index (MSCI ACWI Ex USA NR USD), 5.03%.
    • KWEB expense ratio is 0.69%, which is not negligible. Is the fund expensive to you, and does it align to your investment strategy?

    Other relevant KWEB comparisons

    You may also want to check out the following KWEB comparisons that investors often look for on Finny

    Or use Finny's Comparison Tool to create a comparison you'd like to see.
    You can check out all comparisons Finny users have looked for here. Feel free to the browse the list and view the comparisons that are of an interest to you.