Both HAHA and MCHI are ETFs. HAHA has a higher expense ratio than MCHI (0.95% vs 0.58%). Below is the comparison between HAHA and MCHI.
|Management Style||passive (index-based)||passive (index-based)|
|Underlying Index||CSI 300 Smart Index||MSCI China Index|
The Fund seeks high current income. Growth of capital is a secondary objective. The fund normally invests at least 80%, and may invest up to 100%, of its assets in non-investment grade debt securities.
HAHA performance & returns
Top 10 Holdings (22.61% of Total Assets)
|Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd||601318||5.56%|
|China Merchants Bank Co Ltd Class H||CIHHF||2.52%|
|Kweichow Moutai Co Ltd||600519||2.44%|
|Industrial Bank Co Ltd||601166||2.20%|
|Midea Group Co Ltd Class A||000333||1.82%|
|Gree Electric Appliances Inc of Zhuhai||000651||1.71%|
|Bank of Communications Co Ltd H||BKFCF||1.69%|
|China Minsheng Banking Corp Ltd H||CGMBF||1.61%|
|China Vanke Co Ltd H||CHVKF||1.57%|
|Inner Mongolia Yili Industrial Group Co Ltd||600887||1.49%|
HAHA prosNone that we could think of.
HAHA consNone that we could think of.
Other relevant HAHA comparisons
You may also want to check out the following HAHA comparisons that investors often look for on Finny
- HAHA vs ASHR
- HAHA vs CNYA
- HAHA vs CN
- HAHA vs ASHX
- HAHA vs CNHX
- HAHA vs FCA
- HAHA vs GXC
- HAHA vs KBA
- HAHA vs KFYP
- HAHA vs MCHI
iShares Trust - iShares MSCI China ETF is an exchange traded fund launched by BlackRock, Inc. It is managed by BlackRock Fund Advisors. The fund invests in public equity markets of China. It invests in stocks of companies operating across diversified sectors. It invests in growth and value stocks of companies across diversified market capitalization. The fund seeks to track the performance of the MSCI China Index, by using representative sampling technique. iShares Trust - iShares MSCI China ETF was formed on March 29, 2011 and is domiciled in the United States.
MCHI performance & returns
Top 10 Holdings (38.98% of Total Assets)
|Tencent Holdings Ltd||00700||13.40%|
|Alibaba Group Holding Ltd Ordinary Shares||09988||7.61%|
|Meituan Class B||03690||4.15%|
|China Construction Bank Corp Class H||00939||3.16%|
|Ping An Insurance (Group) Co. of China Ltd Class H||02318||2.25%|
|JD.com Inc Ordinary Shares - Class A||09618||1.84%|
|NetEase Inc Ordinary Shares||09999||1.72%|
|PDD Holdings Inc ADR||PDD||1.70%|
|Bank Of China Ltd Class H||03988||1.55%|
MCHI prosNone that we could think of.
The following are MCHI weaknesses from our perspective:
- MCHI net assets are $0.00 million. This fund is not a popular choice with retail investors.
- MCHI 3-year return is -8.28%, which is lower than the 3-year return of the benchmark index (MSCI ACWI Ex USA NR USD), 2.21%.
- MCHI 5-year return is -6.34%, which is lower than the 5-year return of the benchmark index (MSCI ACWI Ex USA NR USD), 2.33%.
- MCHI 10-year return is 1.75%, which is lower than the 10-year return of the benchmark index (MSCI ACWI Ex USA NR USD), 5.03%.
- MCHI expense ratio is 0.58%, which is not negligible. Is the fund expensive to you, and does it align to your investment strategy?
Other relevant MCHI comparisons
You may also want to check out the following MCHI comparisons that investors often look for on Finny
- MCHI vs KWEB
- MCHI vs FXI
- MCHI vs GXC
- MCHI vs ASHR
- MCHI vs CNYA
- MCHI vs HAHA
- MCHI vs CN
- MCHI vs ASHX
- MCHI vs CNHX
- MCHI vs FCA
- MCHI vs KBA
- MCHI vs KFYP