NLR vs URA

Both NLR and URA are ETFs. NLR has a lower 5-year return than URA (5.05% vs 12.58%). NLR has a lower expense ratio than URA (0.6% vs 0.69%). Below is the comparison between NLR and URA.

Together with FinMasters
Stock Wars
Pick any two stocks and find out how much money each would've made you had you purchased them at the same time.
NLR URA
Security Type ETF ETF
Category Miscellaneous Sector Natural Resources
Family VanEck Global X
Net Assets N/A N/A
Expense Ratio 0.60% 0.69%
Management Style passive (index-based) passive (index-based)
Dividend Yield 2.12% 7.09%
Underlying Index MVIS Global Uranium & Nuclear Energy Index Solactive Global Uranium Index
YTD Return -2.99% -9.99%
1-Year Return -4.27% -24.90%
3-Year Return 5.24% 26.62%
5-Year Return 5.05% 12.58%
10-Year Return 5.08% -4.31%

NLR

NLR description

null

NLR performance & returns

YTD Return -2.99%
1-Month Return 0.17%
3-Month Return 1.14%
1-Year Return -4.27%
3-Year Return 5.24%
5-Year Return 5.05%
10-Year Return 5.08%
NLR expense ratio is 0.6%.

NLR holdings

Top 10 Holdings (59.33% of Total Assets)

Name Symbol % Assets
Duke Energy Corp DUK 8.07%
Dominion Energy Inc D 7.98%
Exelon Corp EXC 6.94%
Public Service Enterprise Group Inc PEG 6.59%
Entergy Corp ETR 5.76%
Fortum Oyj FORTUM 5.43%
PG&E Corp PCG 5.13%
CEZ a.s CEZ 4.53%
Kansai Electric Power Co Inc 9503 4.51%
Pinnacle West Capital Corp PNW 4.39%

NLR pros

None that we could think of.

NLR cons

The following are NLR weaknesses from our perspective:

  • NLR net assets are $0.00 million. This fund is not a popular choice with retail investors.
  • NLR 3-year return is 5.24%, which is lower than the 3-year return of the benchmark index (MSCI ACWI NR USD), 6.34%.
  • NLR 5-year return is 5.05%, which is lower than the 5-year return of the benchmark index (MSCI ACWI NR USD), 6.51%.
  • NLR 10-year return is 5.08%, which is lower than the 10-year return of the benchmark index (MSCI ACWI NR USD), 8.76%.
  • NLR expense ratio is 0.6%, which is not negligible. Is the fund expensive to you, and does it align to your investment strategy?

Other relevant NLR comparisons

You may also want to check out the following NLR comparisons that investors often look for on Finny

Or use Finny's Comparison Tool to create a comparison you'd like to see.

URA

URA description

null

URA performance & returns

YTD Return -9.99%
1-Month Return 4.18%
3-Month Return 4.08%
1-Year Return -24.90%
3-Year Return 26.62%
5-Year Return 12.58%
10-Year Return -4.31%
URA expense ratio is 0.69%.

URA holdings

Top 10 Holdings (70.45% of Total Assets)

Name Symbol % Assets
Cameco Corp CCO.TO 23.43%
National Atomic Co Kazatomprom JSC ADR KAP 22.81%
NexGen Energy Ltd NXE.TO 5.36%
Denison Mines Corp DML.TO 3.50%
Energy Fuels Inc EFR 3.19%
Paladin Energy Ltd PDN.AX 3.02%
Uranium Participation Corp U.TO 2.58%
Doosan Heavy Industries & Construction Co Ltd 034020.KS 2.51%
Uranium Energy Corp UEC 2.12%
Daewoo Engineering & Construction Co Ltd 047040.KS 1.93%

URA pros

The following are URA strengths from our perspective:

  • URA 3-year return is 26.62%, which is higher than the 3-year return of the benchmark index (MSCI ACWI NR USD), 6.34%.
  • URA 5-year return is 12.58%, which is higher than the 5-year return of the benchmark index (MSCI ACWI NR USD), 6.51%.

URA cons

The following are URA weaknesses from our perspective:

  • URA net assets are $0.00 million. This fund is not a popular choice with retail investors.
  • URA 10-year return is -4.31%, which is lower than the 10-year return of the benchmark index (MSCI ACWI NR USD), 8.76%.
  • URA expense ratio is 0.69%, which is not negligible. Is the fund expensive to you, and does it align to your investment strategy?

Other relevant URA comparisons

You may also want to check out the following URA comparisons that investors often look for on Finny

Or use Finny's Comparison Tool to create a comparison you'd like to see.
You can check out all comparisons Finny users have looked for here. Feel free to the browse the list and view the comparisons that are of an interest to you.