XLV vs VHT
Both XLV and VHT are ETFs. XLV has a lower 5-year return than VHT (11.04% vs 12.07%). XLV has a higher expense ratio than VHT (0.13% vs 0.1%). Below is the comparison between XLV and VHT.
|Segment||Equity: U.S. Health Care||Equity: U.S. Health Care|
|Issuer||Vanguard||State Street Global Advisors|
|Management Style||passive (index-based)||passive (index-based)|
|Underlying Index||MSCI US Investable Market Health Care 25/50 Index||S&P Health Care Select Sector Index|
The Fund seeks to provide investment results that, before expenses, correspond generally to the price and yield performance of the Health Care Select Sector Index. Under normal market conditions, the fund generally invests substantially all, but at least 95%, of its total assets in the securities comprising the Index.
XLV performance & returns
Top 10 Holdings (51.01% of Total Assets)
|Johnson & Johnson||JNJ||9.87%|
|UnitedHealth Group Inc||UNH||7.45%|
|Merck & Co Inc||MRK||5.20%|
|Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc||TMO||3.81%|
|Eli Lilly and Co||LLY||3.68%|
|Bristol-Myers Squibb Company||BMY||3.54%|
Other relevant XLV comparisons
You may also want to check out the following XLV comparisons that investors often look for on Finny
The Fund seeks to track the performance of a benchmark index that measures the investment return of health care stocks; specifically the MSCI U.S. Investable Market Health Care Index. This is an index of stocks of large-, mid-, and small-size U.S. companies within the health care sector.
VHT performance & returns
Top 10 Holdings (41.98% of Total Assets)
|Johnson & Johnson||JNJ||8.07%|
|UnitedHealth Group Inc||UNH||6.03%|
|Merck & Co Inc||MRK||4.28%|
|Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc||TMO||3.47%|
|Bristol-Myers Squibb Company||BMY||2.78%|
Other relevant VHT comparisons
You may also want to check out the following VHT comparisons that investors often look for on Finny
You can check out all comparisons Finny users have looked for here. Feel free to the browse the list and view the comparisons that are of an interest to you.